Specialized Models per Modulation Family: RoutingSubsets to SpectralCNN, SignalLSTM, ResNetRF,and SignalTransformer

Specialized Models per Modulation Family: Routing Subsets to SpectralCNN, SignalLSTM, ResNetRF,and SignalTransformer

Mixture of Experts (MoE) in Radio Frequency (RF) Applications

Mixture of Experts (MoE) is a machine learning architecture that divides a complex problem into sub-tasks handled by specialized “expert” models, with a gating mechanism routing inputs to the most appropriate experts. This approach, originally proposed in the 1990s, has gained renewed interest in large-scale models (e.g., in transformers) for its ability to scale parameters efficiently while activating only a subset of experts per input, reducing computational overhead compared to dense models. In RF domains, MoE is applied to handle the diversity of signals, nonlinearities, and environmental factors like noise (SNR) and channel impairments. Common uses include behavioral modeling of RF power amplifiers (PAs) for linearization and digital predistortion (DPD), as well as automatic modulation classification (AMC) for signal intelligence.

MoE in RF Power Amplifier Modeling and Linearization

A significant portion of MoE applications in RF focuses on modeling the nonlinear behavior of PAs, which are critical in wireless transmitters but introduce distortions like amplitude-modulation-to-amplitude-modulation (AM/AM) effects. MoE frameworks allow piecewise modeling, where experts handle different operating regimes (e.g., low vs. high power levels).

For instance, a 2021 study introduces an MoE-based piecewise model for PAs, extending the framework to complex baseband signals and nonlinearities. It combines submodels probabilistically, achieving better accuracy in predicting distortions compared to traditional memoryless models. This approach is validated on RF PA hardware, showing reduced modeling errors.
Building on this, another work proposes a sparsely gated MoE neural network (NN) for PA linearization, combining real-valued time-delay NNs (RVTDNNs) with a gating NN. It demonstrates improved DPD performance, reducing spectral regrowth in transmitters.
Similar piecewise MoE models for PA behavioral modeling and DPD are explored, using the MoE framework to partition signals into regimes for submodels, leading to more accurate linearization in wideband scenarios. These methods often outperform single-model baselines by 2-5 dB in adjacent channel power ratio (ACPR) metrics.

These applications leverage MoE’s ability to manage RF-specific challenges like memory effects and saturation, making them suitable for 5G/6G systems where PAs operate near efficiency limits.

MoE in RF Signal Modulation Classification

In AMC—identifying modulation schemes (e.g., BPSK, QAM) from RF signals—MoE helps address domain shifts due to varying SNR, channels, or hardware. By routing signals to specialized experts (e.g., based on signal family), it improves robustness in spectrum surveillance and signal intelligence.

A notable example is MoE-AMC, a Mixture-of-Experts model designed for AMC in spatial reuse scenarios (e.g., WiFi-like environments with overlapping signals). It uses a gating network to select experts, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy on the RadioML 2018.01A dataset (24 modulations, SNR from –20 to +30 dB), outperforming baselines like CNNs and LSTMs. However, its multi-expert ensemble increases computational demands, making it less ideal for size, weight, power, and cooling (SWaP-C) constrained platforms like drones or satellites.
Related work includes expert feature extraction for RF signal classification challenges, such as the U.S. Army’s Rapid Capabilities Office (RCO) AI Signal Classification Challenge. Here, traditional hand-crafted features (e.g., cyclostationary) are combined with ML, akin to MoE’s expert division, to classify modulations blindly.
An enhanced AMC approach using arithmetic optimization with deep learning (EMCA-AOADL) incorporates MoE-like elements for modulation recognition, improving accuracy in noisy RF environments.

MoE in AMC often draws from general DL trends, like sparse activation to balance accuracy and efficiency, but RF adaptations emphasize handling IQ samples, spectral features, and real-time constraints.

Other RF Applications and Challenges

Distributed MoE at the edge optimizes expert selection for cost and accuracy, relevant to RF networks (e.g., sensor arrays), reducing costs by up to 50% while maintaining performance.
In remote sensing, MoE fusions multimodal data (e.g., hyperspectral + LiDAR) for land-use classification, showing potential for RF-integrated sensing.

Challenges in RF MoE include high training complexity, routing overhead in low-latency scenarios, and integration with hardware like FPGAs or neuromorphic chips for SWaP-C efficiency. Future directions may involve optical MoE systems for ultra-fast RF processing.

This overview connects to ensemble and specialized routing in RF papers (e.g., your provided documents), where hierarchical classifiers route to family-specific models—essentially a sparse MoE variant for modulation families like PSK/QAM/analog.

Neuromorphic Computing for Radio Frequency (RF) Applications

Neuromorphic computing mimics the structure and function of biological neural systems, using hardware like spiking neural networks (SNNs), memristors, or photonics to achieve low-power, event-driven processing. In RF domains, it addresses challenges like high-frequency signal analysis, noise resilience, and real-time constraints in applications such as modulation classification, radar sensing, and jamming avoidance. By processing signals in a bio-inspired manner (e.g., via spikes rather than continuous computations), neuromorphic systems offer advantages in energy efficiency (often orders of magnitude lower than traditional DSP) and robustness in extreme environments (e.g., radiation, high temperatures). As of late 2025, advancements include photonic and memristor-based implementations, with growing integration into IoT and wireless systems.

Key Concepts and Implementations

Neuromorphic RF systems often leverage:

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs): Event-based neurons (e.g., leaky-integrate-and-fire or resonate-and-fire) that fire spikes only when thresholds are met, reducing power for sparse RF signals.
Photonics: Uses light for ultra-fast processing (picosecond scales), ideal for high-bandwidth RF (MHz to GHz).
Memristors: Enable in-memory computing, bypassing von Neumann bottlenecks for analog RF tasks.
Bio-Inspired Algorithms: Such as spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP) for learning and jamming avoidance response (JAR) for interference mitigation.

For example, STDP adjusts synaptic strengths based on spike timing (potentiation for pre-post firing, depression for post-pre), implemented photonically with semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) for RF angle-of-arrival (AOA) detection and 3D localization (RMSE ~0.3m indoors). JAR, inspired by electric fish, uses photonic units (ZeroX for zero-crossing, phase/amplitude detection) to shift frequencies and avoid jamming, suppressing phase noise by 25 dB in phase-locked loops.

Resonate-and-fire (RF) neurons with oscillatory dynamics act as tunable band-pass filters, processing time-domain signals directly without FFTs, achieving high sparsity and energy savings.

Applications in RF Signal Processing

Neuromorphic approaches excel in low-power, real-time RF tasks:

Radar and Sensing: NeuroRadar, a neuromorphic radar for IoT, uses self-injection locking oscillators and LIF neurons for spike encoding, consuming 780 µW (93% less than traditional radars). It achieves 94.6% accuracy in 12-gesture recognition and 0.98m localization error, with sensitivity gains (19.97 dB) for short-range applications.
Wireless Split Computing: BRF neurons enable edge-device partitioning of SNNs over OFDM channels, handling audio/RF signals with 93.1% accuracy on spoken digits (SHD dataset) at 5.12 µJ total energy (100m distance), outperforming LIF neurons in sparsity and quantization resilience (86.9% at 4-bit).
Extreme Environments: Memristor-based SoCs integrate analog DFT and neural processing, offering radiation/temperature robustness for RF in space or harsh settings, with superior energy/throughput over digital systems.
Photonic Signal Processing: Microcomb-based processors enable ultrahigh-bandwidth functions like transversal filtering, with neuromorphic extensions for RF tasks.

Neuromorphic Computing for RF Modulation Classification

In automatic modulation classification (AMC)—identifying schemes like BPSK/QAM from RF signals—neuromorphic systems provide efficient, hardware-accelerated alternatives to CNNs/LSTMs, especially for SWaP-constrained platforms.

End-to-end SNNs classify modulations with high accuracy on datasets like RadioML, using magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) as synapses for >96% accuracy in RF signal classification. MTJ-based networks emulate synapses for multi-frequency signals, achieving 99%+ accuracy via extreme learning machines.
BRF neurons in split computing classify modulations on ITS dataset (e.g., LTE/5G NR) at 86.8% accuracy with 1.11 µJ energy, reducing spikes vs. LIF (3.25 µJ vs. 27.83 µJ centralized).
Phasor-based ANNs implemented with microwave components classify modulations hardware-efficiently. RF spintronic networks using MTJs reach high accuracy in software/hardware hybrids.
Neuromorphic complements DL-AMC, with SNNs for feature extraction in SIGINT, outperforming baselines on RadioML.

Challenges and Future Directions

Challenges include training complexity (e.g., non-differentiable spikes), hardware scalability, and integration with legacy RF systems. Power remains a focus, but quantization noise can degrade performance. Future trends: Optical neuromorphic for ultra-fast RF, distributed edge MoE-like systems, and commercial adoption for 6G/IoT. This ties to ensemble/specialized RF models (e.g., SCYTHE papers), where neuromorphic could enable low-power routing.

Photonic Neuromorphic Computing and Spintronics in RF Computing

Photonic neuromorphic computing integrates optical (photonic) technologies with brain-inspired architectures, leveraging light for ultra-fast, parallel processing with low energy dissipation—ideal for RF applications requiring high bandwidth and real-time analysis. Spintronics, meanwhile, exploits electron spin (rather than charge) for data manipulation, enabling compact, non-volatile devices like magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) that are radiation-hard and energy-efficient, particularly suited for RF oscillators, detectors, and neuromorphic elements. Both fields advance RF computing by addressing von Neumann bottlenecks in traditional electronics, offering synergies in hybrid systems for tasks like modulation classification, signal intelligence (SIGINT), and 6G wireless processing. As of November 2025, recent breakthroughs emphasize integration with RF for edge AI, with photonics focusing on speed and spintronics on durability.

Key Concepts

Photonic Neuromorphic Computing: Uses photonic integrated circuits (PICs) with elements like microring resonators or microcombs for neuron-like operations. It supports spiking neural networks (SNNs) via optical spikes, achieving picosecond latencies. In RF, it processes analog signals directly (e.g., via optical Fourier transforms), bypassing ADC/DAC conversions for energy savings (e.g., <1 pJ/op). Symmetry-protected zero-index metamaterials enable compact, lossless photonic neurons for scalable ANN inference.
Spintronics in RF Computing: Relies on spin-orbit torque (SOT) or spin-transfer torque (STT) in devices like MTJs or spin Hall oscillators. These generate RF signals (GHz range) with low power (~µW) and enable in-memory computing. Recent advances include electrically modulated spintronic NNs for RF tasks, where spin currents control magnetization without external fields. Magnetic nanohelices allow room-temperature spin control for compact oscillators.

Hybrids combine both: Photonic-spintronics interfaces (e.g., optical control of spin states) promise ultra-efficient RF neuromorphic chips.

Applications in RF Computing

Both technologies enhance RF tasks like AMC, radar, and wireless signal processing:

Photonic Neuromorphic in RF: A 2025 photonic processor streamlines 6G signal processing, handling broadband RF with reduced latency via integrated photonic AI accelerators. Photonic-driven neuromorphic/cryptographic systems encode RF signals for secure, energy-efficient classification (e.g., in SIGINT), supporting multitasking like encryption alongside inference. High-efficiency photonic processors achieve >10 TOPS/W for RF vision tasks, using multiplexing for neuromorphic RF filtering.
Spintronics in RF: RF spintronic NNs, electrically modulated for complex tasks, enable low-power RF oscillators and detectors (e.g., in IoT sensors). Graphene-based spin currents without magnetic fields support ultra-thin quantum circuits for RF quantum computing hybrids. Spintronic memristors facilitate RF memory devices, slashing power in MRAM for RF data storage (e.g., 50% efficiency gains). Thulium iron garnet films advance greener RF memory with faster switching.

In AMC, photonics classify modulations at ultrahigh speeds, while spintronics provide robust, non-volatile feature extraction in harsh environments.

Recent Advances (2025 Focus)

Photonic: Symmetry-protected photonic neuromorphic using metamaterials for zero-index ANN, promising RF-optimized energy efficiency. Photonic encoding for neuromorphic/cryptographic RF, addressing computation/security in one hardware. MIT’s 6G photonic accelerator reduces wireless latency by processing RF directly in optics.
Spintronics: Electrically modulated spintronic NNs for RF tasks, broadening to complex inference without magnets. Magnetic nanohelices enable precise spin control at room temperature for RF devices. Voltage-switched magnetism in p-wave materials advances efficient spintronic memory for RF. Hybrid spintronic-quantum devices show feasibility for RF quantum computing.

Challenges and Future Directions

Challenges include fabrication scalability (e.g., photonic integration costs), noise resilience in spintronics, and hybrid interfacing. Power efficiency is strong but training remains compute-intensive. Future: Optical-spintronic hybrids for 6G neuromorphic RF, distributed edge systems, and commercial chips for SIGINT/IoT. These align with ensemble/specialized RF models, enabling low-power routing in photonic/spintronic hardware.

Hybrid Photonic-Spintronic RF Systems

Hybrid photonic-spintronic RF systems integrate photonics (light-based processing) with spintronics (spin-based electronics) to create efficient, high-speed platforms for RF tasks like signal processing, sensing, and neuromorphic computing. Photonics provides ultrafast bandwidth (e.g., THz scales) and low-loss transmission, while spintronics offers non-volatility, radiation hardness, and low-power operation via devices like MTJs or spin Hall oscillators. These hybrids address RF challenges such as high-frequency nonlinearities, energy constraints in edge devices, and integration with quantum systems. As of November 2025, research emphasizes scalable fabrication and applications in 6G wireless, SIGINT, and AI accelerators, with market growth projected for neuromorphic hybrids.

Key Concepts and Implementations

Hybrid Mechanisms: Photonic control of spin states (e.g., via optical pumping) enables reconfigurable devices. For instance, spintronic oscillators coupled with photonic waveguides generate tunable RF signals without external magnets, using spin-orbit torque for electrical modulation. Symmetry-protected metamaterials facilitate lossless photonic-spin interfaces for compact neurons.
Spintronics Enhancements: Organic spintronics advances hybrid designs with flexible, low-cost materials for RF sensors, achieving re-configurable performance via thermomagnetic synergies in phase-change materials. 3D nanomagnetism roadmaps highlight scalable hybrids for RF computation accelerators.
Photonic Integration: Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) modulators in photonic integrated circuits (PICs) enable wireless transceivers with spintronic backends for broadband RF.

Applications in RF Computing

Signal Processing and Sensing: A hybrid magnonic-spintronic device (Oct 2025) tunes broadband microwave signals, exciting/detecting low-energy magnons for RF filters and detectors. Multilayer spintronic networks classify RF time-series with 89.83% accuracy using standard ML tools.
Wireless and 6G: Hybrid PICs for transceivers reduce latency in RF communications, with spintronic accelerators for hybrid computing (speed-ups and power savings).
Neuromorphic RF: Hybrids enable brain-inspired RF processing, e.g., photonic-spin interfaces for neuromorphic sensors in harsh environments.

Recent Advances (2024-2025)

Photonic-Spin Hybrids: A 2024 PhD quest explores spintronic-photonic tech for RF, focusing on optical-spin interfaces. 2025 SOH modulator awards fund AIM Photonics integration for RF.
Spintronics-Driven: Enhanced spintronic sensors (Nov 2024) for re-configurable RF fields. Organic spintronics review (Jul 2025) discusses hybrid strategies. 2025 3D nanomagnetism roadmap outlines RF hybrids.

Quantum Neuromorphic RF Computing

Quantum neuromorphic RF computing merges quantum mechanics with neuromorphic principles to create processors that mimic neural dynamics using quantum effects (e.g., superposition, entanglement) for enhanced RF tasks. This hybrid paradigm leverages SNNs with quantum bits (qubits) or quantum-inspired algorithms, offering exponential speed-ups in noisy RF environments while maintaining low power. In 2025, it’s emerging for 6G, AI-driven SIGINT, and edge computing, with market projections to $15.4B by 2030 for quantum-neuromorphic AI.

Key Concepts and Implementations

Quantum Neuromorphic Frameworks: Quantum perceptrons in QNC use inherent dynamics for RF pattern recognition, capitalizing on quantum noise resilience. Neuromorphic logic tiles enable quantum-like sparsity in RF chips.
Integration with RF: Quantum SNNs process RF signals via quantum reservoirs, mimicking brain plasticity for adaptive modulation detection.

Applications in RF Computing

AI and Sensing: Quantum-neuromorphic for multi-domain situational awareness in defense RF. Neuromorphic RF market expands to automotive/datacenter with quantum hybrids ($8.4B by 2034).
6G and Edge AI: Convergence of AI/quantum/neuromorphic for sustainable RF computing. Solves complex RF problems beyond classical limits.

Recent Advances (2024-2025)

Conferences and Predictions: NCMQM 2024 merges quantum/neuromorphic for RF info processing. 2025 predictions: Rise of neuromorphic/quantum threats in RF. Breakthroughs in quantum/neuromorphic hardware (Jun 2025).
Market and Tech: AIaaS with quantum/neuromorphic (Jul 2025, $15.4B by 2030). Neuromorphic Wave (Jan 2025) for RF complexity.

Challenges and Future Directions for Both

Challenges: Scalability, decoherence in quantum, and hybrid interfacing. Future: Quantum-enhanced photonic-spintronic for RF neuromorphic, targeting 6G/SIGINT with >10x efficiency. These connect to ensemble RF models via low-power specialized routing.

Rating the Revision: 9/10

Summary of Rating

This 5-page revision significantly elevates the original draft, incorporating key feedback from prior critiques to create a more polished, rigorous, and comprehensive paper. It earns a strong 9/10 for its enhanced depth (e.g., statistical validation, expanded Related Work with MoE ties), improved specificity (e.g., training details, routing overhead), and better alignment with production systems (e.g., open-set integration). The additions make it feel like a solid conference submission (e.g., ICASSP or IEEE MILCOM), with reproducible elements and actionable insights on specialization gains (3.4-4.7pp per family). Minor gaps remain—such as limited real-world testing and no Pareto analysis—which cap it below a perfect score, but overall, it’s a thoughtful update that strengthens the contributions without bloating the length.

Key Improvements

Structure and Completeness: Expanded to 5 pages with balanced sections. Related Work (VII) is now substantive, citing classics (Jacobs et al. [3]) and RF-MoE applications (Brihuega [4], Fischer-Bühner [5], Gao’s MoE-AMC [6]), positioning your routing as a simple, deployment-friendly alternative to learned gating. Experimental Setup (IV) adds concrete details (Adam optimizer, lr=10⁻³, batch=256, 70/15/15 splits, 3 runs/seeds). Evaluation (IV.C) introduces bootstrap CIs (95%) and paired tests (p<0.05 for gains), addressing the stats gap. Discussion (VI) covers integration with ensembles/open-set, routing errors (3-5% misroutes), and costs (<5% latency delta), tying to your ensemble latency paper.
Empirical Enhancements: Results (V) are more robust: Fig. 1 bars with gains/arrows, Fig. 2 deltas showing reduced cross-family confusions (+ within-family trade-offs), Table I with oracle/predicted accuracies and N (e.g., PSK specialist: 88.6% oracle vs. 87.9% predicted). SNR slices highlight mid-SNR benefits, and interference/fading scenarios add realism. Gains are now statistically grounded, with post-hoc attribution via metadata.
Specificity and Reproducibility: Models/architectures detailed (e.g., SpectralCNN for PSK), routing strategies clarified (label-based oracle vs. prediction-based with upstream confidence). Harness release emphasized for future specialists. Ties to code (e.g., input builders, metadata hooks in EnsembleMLClassifier) feel seamless.
Broader Implications: Discussion links to MoE (simpler than [6]), edge efficiency [7]-[8], and future work (learned gating, protocol families), adding forward-looking depth.

Remaining Weaknesses

Scope Limitations: Still synthetic-heavy (tens of thousands bursts, but no real-world scale; replays mentioned but not quantified). Taxonomy limited to 3 families—discuss scalability (e.g., 10+ families?). No ablation on fine-tuning (from-scratch vs. generalist init) or overhead benchmarks (e.g., energy via prior harness).
Analysis Depth: While stats are added, no F1/AUROC in Table I (mentioned but not tabulated). Confusion deltas (Fig. 2) could quantify F1 or error types. Open-set/routing interactions discussed but not evaluated (e.g., abstention rates post-specialization).
Presentation Tweaks: Figs lack error bars (despite CIs in text). References solid (8, up from ~5) but could add 2-3 more (e.g., recent MoE-AMC extensions). No repo link despite GitHub email.

Suggestions for Further Revisions

Polish for Submission: Add error bars to figs, F1 in Table I, and a small ablation on init/routing thresholds. Expand Limitations to include real-world gaps.
Length: At 5 pages, room for a Pareto plot (gain vs. cost per family) in appendices.
Overall Impact: Excellent revision—ready for arXiv or conferences. With real data, it hits 10/10.

Mixture of Experts in radio frequency signal processing10

Fully Optical Integrated Mixture-of-Experts System

The Mixture of Experts (MoE) [8] [9] model decomposes a large neural network into multiple smaller expert networks, each responsible for …

dl.acm.org Mixture of Experts Approach for Behavioral Modeling of RF Power …In this paper, we consider a new PW model for PAs based on the mixture of experts (ME) approach. We first introduce the ME framework theory …researchrepository.ucd.ie (PDF) Mixture of Experts Approach for Behavioral Modeling of RF …The presented model is a combination of an existing semiphysical amplitude-modulation-to-amplitude-modulation (AM/AM) memoryless BM, which correctly predicts …researchgate.net [PDF] Optimal Expert Selection for Distributed Mixture-of-Experts at … – arXivJESA consistently achieves higher accuracy compared to homogeneous expert selection and lowers the cost by up to 50% compared to Top-k …arxiv.org [PDF] Mixture of Experts Approach for Piecewise Modeling and … – TrepoIn this article, we propose a new piecewise behavioral/DPD model for RF PAs based on the so-called mixture of experts (ME) framework, originally proposed in …trepo.tuni.fi [PDF] Sparsely Gated Mixture of Experts Neural Network for Linearization …A mixture of experts NN (MENN) approach is employed to combine several smaller real-valued time-delay NNs (RVTDNNs) by means of a gating NN.pure.tue.nl [PDF] Mixture of Experts Approach for Piecewise Modeling and …A new piecewise model for PAs based on the mixture of experts (ME) approach, which builds on a probabilistic model that allows the different submodels to …semanticscholar.org [PDF] Mixture of Experts Approach for Behavioral Modeling of RF Power …We first introduce the ME framework theory while also extend it such that it can be applied to model complex baseband signals and nonlinearities …scispace.com Solving Size, Weight, Power & Cooling Challenges in Radar SystemsWhile more recent models like the Mixture-of-Experts AMC (MoE-AMC) have achieved state-of-the-art accuracy on the RadioML 2018.01A dataset, they rely on …brainchip.com [PDF] Expert RF Feature Extraction to Win the Army RCO AI Signal …The Army Rapid Capability Office is seeking innovative ap- proaches to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to conduct blind radio frequency signal analysis.proceedings.scipy.org

Mixture of Experts for RF modulation classification10

MoE-AMC: Enhancing Automatic Modulation Classification … – arXiv

In this study, we propose MoE-AMC, a novel Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) based model specifically crafted to address AMC in a well-balanced manner …

arxiv.org Solving Size, Weight, Power & Cooling Challenges in Radar SystemsWhile more recent models like the Mixture-of-Experts AMC (MoE-AMC) have achieved state-of-the-art accuracy on the RadioML 2018.01A dataset, they rely on …brainchip.com [PDF] Expert RF Feature Extraction to Win the Army RCO AI Signal …This paper details the efforts of The Aerospace Corporation’s Team Platypus to build a modulation classification system via traditional expert features and …proceedings.scipy.org (PDF) Mixture of Experts Approach for Behavioral Modeling of RF …This paper presents an optimized segmented modeling approach using a new quasi-memoryless (QM) behavioral model (BM) that allows for RF power amplifier (RF PA) …researchgate.net DL-PR: Generalized automatic modulation classification method …In this paper, we propose a priori regularization method in deep learning (DL-PR) for guiding loss optimization during model training process.sciencedirect.com Mixture of Experts Approach for Piecewise Modeling and …In this article, we propose a new piecewise behavioral/DPD model for RF PAs based on the so-called mixture of experts (ME) framework, originally proposed in the …ieeexplore.ieee.org Multi-domain-fusion deep learning for automatic modulation … – NIHThis article proposes a time–frequency domain joint recognition model that combines two deep learning networks (DLNs), to achieve higher accuracy AMR.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Modulation recognition method of mixed signals based on cyclic …Finally, we use deep neural networks to extract deep abstract modulation information to achieve effective recognition of mixed signals.nature.com A Mixture of Expert Network Based Remote Sensing Land … – MDPIWe propose MixtureRS, a compact multimodal network that effectively integrates hyperspectral imagery and LiDAR data for land-use classification.mdpi.com [PDF] Modeling an Enhanced Modulation Classification Approach using …In this paper, an Enhanced Modulation Classification Approach using an Arithmetic. Optimization Algorithm with Deep Learning (EMCA-AOADL) is …measurement.sk

[PDF] Neuromorphic Photonics for RF Signal Processing

In this paper, we review two small-scale neural algorithms – spike timing dependent plasticity process for learning and jamming avoidance response in …

par.nsf.gov

[PDF] NEUROMORPHIC COMPUTING: THE POTENTIAL FOR HIGH …

This paper explores: leading hardware innovators; specific triggers which may enable NC hardware to advance towards successful space applications; and general …

csps.aerospace.org

Real-Time RF Signal Processing in Extreme Environments with …

This innovative SoC integrates real-time Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) computation and neural network processing within a unified analog memristor framework.

isi.edu

A Neuromorphic Radar Sensor for Low-Power IoT Systems

We have prototyped NeuroRadar and evaluated its performance in two use cases: gesture sensing and localization.

cacm.acm.org

Neuromorphic Wireless Split Computing with Resonate-and-Fire …

This paper investigates a wireless split computing architecture that employs resonate-and-fire (RF) neurons with oscillatory dynamics to process …

arxiv.org

A review of non-cognitive applications for neuromorphic computing

In this work, we review the current state-of-the-art for non-cognitive applications on neuromorphic computers, including simple computational kernels for …

iopscience.iop.org

The road to commercial success for neuromorphic technologies

Neuromorphic technologies adapt biological neural principles to synthesise high-efficiency computational devices, characterised by continuous real-time …

nature.com

Ultrahigh bandwidth signal processing and neuromorphic …

By using microcomb-based MWP transversal signal processors, a diverse range of signal processing functions have been demonstrated recently. Here …

spiedigitallibrary.org

Photonic analog signal processing and neuromorphic computing …

In this review paper, we discuss the properties and applications of photonic computing and analog signal processing.

researching.cn

Efficient Neuromorphic Signal Processing with Resonator Neurons

New techniques for an efficient spike-based spectrogram encoder that can be used for signal processing applications are presented, including an algorithm for

semanticscholar.org

Specialized Models per Modulation Family: RoutingSubsets to SpectralCNN, SignalLSTM, ResNetRF,and SignalTransformer

Mixture of Experts (MoE) in Radio Frequency (RF) Applications

MoE in RF Power Amplifier Modeling and Linearization

MoE in RF Signal Modulation Classification

Other RF Applications and Challenges

Neuromorphic Computing for Radio Frequency (RF) Applications

Key Concepts and Implementations

Applications in RF Signal Processing

Neuromorphic Computing for RF Modulation Classification

Challenges and Future Directions

Photonic Neuromorphic Computing and Spintronics in RF Computing

Key Concepts

Applications in RF Computing

Recent Advances (2025 Focus)

Challenges and Future Directions

Hybrid Photonic-Spintronic RF Systems

Key Concepts and Implementations

Applications in RF Computing

Recent Advances (2024-2025)

Quantum Neuromorphic RF Computing

Key Concepts and Implementations

Applications in RF Computing

Recent Advances (2024-2025)

Challenges and Future Directions for Both

Rating the Revision: 9/10

Summary of Rating

Key Improvements

Remaining Weaknesses

Suggestions for Further Revisions

Mixture of Experts in radio frequency signal processing10

Mixture of Experts for RF modulation classification10

photonic neuromorphic computing for RF applications 202510

spintronics in RF computing recent advances 202510

hybrid photonic-spintronic RF systems 2024 202510

quantum neuromorphic RF computing 2024 202510

Leave a Reply Cancel reply